|
Marlon Brando & Sophia Loren in a scene from A Countess From Hong Kong |
The first time I saw this film, I expected it to be
awful because everything I had ever read about it said so. But I was surprised. Sure, it’s not Chaplin’s best by a long shot, but it wasn’t terrible.
I think it would have been a better film had he made it in the 1930s,
as he had originally intended, with Paulette Goddard and Gary Cooper in
the leading roles. However, Sophia Loren did a wonderful job—she took
Chaplin’s direction well and was able to be funny in some scenes and
moving in others (I found her character at times to be very Tramp-like). Marlon Brando, on the other hand, seemed stiff and
uncomfortable. I’m sure due to the fact that he disliked Chaplin’s
directing methods. But it was fun to see him jumping around the room,
obviously mimicking Chaplin’s every move.
|
Charlie directs his daughter Geraldine and Marlon Brando in a dance scene. His son Sydney and daughters Josephine and Victoria also appear in the film. |
It was strange to see a Chaplin film in color. The beauty of
black-and-white may have added something to this film. However, it’s
quite impressive that during Chaplin’s long career he went from silents
to talkies to technicolor.
Chaplin has a very brief cameo in the film as a seasick butler. For a
fan, it’s a bittersweet moment because it’s the last time our hero
ever appears on screen.
|
Charlie's cameo |
|
Despite its flaws,
Countess has some very funny scenes and the music is
some of Chaplin’s best. I have read that the failure of this film
affected him deeply and he never quite recovered from it. Were the
critics expecting another
City Lights? They should have given the old man a break. It was the last film of his career, and I believe it deserves some respect.
|
Behind the camera for the last time |
Lovely post, Jess! I still have yet to see Countess, but I've always suspected that I'd have a similar reaction to it. Thanks for posting!
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! I think all Chaplin fans should see this film at least once. It's old-fashioned for 1967 and some of the acting is wooden, but there are moments in it that are pure Chaplin, including the ending.
DeleteI think the only thing wrong with it is the casting of Brando. Imagine someone like the 1967 Jack Lemmon in that role. I agree with what David Robinson said:
Delete"Seen today...no longer linked to a particular period, just a work from
an undefined past, (The Countess from Hong Kong) has acquired a gentle,surprising charm." David Robinson CHAPLIN - HIS LIFE AND ART (1985)
That was from me.
DeletePhil
"Gentle, surprising charm". I totally agree.
DeleteJerry Epstein's book mentions that Cary Grant was interested in the role of Ogden. I think he would have been wonderful as well.
I agree about Cary Grant! And he had that natural physical grace and comic timing. [sigh]
DeleteI agree Cary Grant had already been tramed with Loren. He would have worked far better than Brando.
ReplyDeletePhil